- Design x Machine
- Posts
- Predictably Irrational: What AI Thinks About Human Behaviour in Design
Predictably Irrational: What AI Thinks About Human Behaviour in Design
A curious dive into the psychology of UX and how machines are learning to navigate It

Have you ever wondered why people click a bright red button more often than a blue one? Or why they abandon checkout pages even after adding items to the cart? Human behaviour is rarely logical. It’s emotional, biased, and deeply influenced by subtle design cues - often without us even realising it.
As UX designers, we’ve long relied on psychology principles to create better user experiences. But now, AI is entering the chat. And it’s not just crunching data - it’s helping us understand, simulate, and even predict irrational user behaviour.
In this article, I’ll explore how AI tools can help identify and leverage psychological patterns in UX. Let’s analyse how machines are learning to think like humans, flaws and all.
Humans Aren’t Rational. Your UI Shouldn’t Be Either.
The concept of “predictable irrationality” popularised by behavioural economist Dan Ariely challenges the assumption that people make logical decisions. Instead, we:
Choose the default to avoid thinking
Trust what looks more expensive
Feel urgency even when timers are fake
Click on shiny things just because they're “shiny”

Predictably Irrational Book by Dan Ariely
Good UX design leverages these behaviours ethically to reduce friction or nudge users toward better decisions. But how do we scale this kind of nuanced design thinking? Enter: AI.
What Happens When AI Learns UX Psychology?
Modern AI tools can analyse patterns in your UX and suggest changes based on user behaviour models. Here are some ways AI and UX psychology are teaming up:
1. AI-Powered Heatmaps
(e.g., Attention Insight, EyeQuant)
AI simulates where users are likely to look or click first. It uses trained models to predict user attention within the first 3–5 seconds without actual user testing.
Psych Principle: Visual hierarchy, Fitts's Law, attention bias
Use case: “Are users skipping the CTA? AI heatmaps might reveal your hero text is stealing the spotlight.”

2. Behavioral Prompt Crafting
(e.g., ChatGPT + UX prompt libraries)
ChatGPT can be prompted to act as a cognitive bias expert. It can analyse your wireframe copy and suggest persuasive rewrites based on psychological triggers like scarcity, authority, or loss aversion.
Psych Principle: Anchoring, Social proof, Reciprocity
Prompt example:
"Act as a UX copywriting expert. Rewrite this CTA for a telco B2B product to trigger loss aversion and increase urgency: 'Book a demo now.'"
3. AI A/B Testing Insights
(e.g., VWO, Google Optimize + AI overlays)
AI can cluster test results and identify not just what worked, but why. It helps detect deeper psychological trends like whether a layout aligns with users’ mental models.
Psych Principle: Hick’s Law, Choice paralysis, Familiarity bias
4. Journey Simulation with Emotion Tracking
(e.g., Useberry + Uizard)
Some tools now track emotional reactions (frustration, excitement, hesitation) through micro-interactions. This is incredibly useful when refining B2B interfaces, where engagement is low-stakes but high-friction.
Psych Principle: Frustration tolerance, Flow theory, User fatigue
Experiments I Ran:
While building personas for B2B (see my previous article), I tested how different AI tools interpreted behavioural patterns across enterprise dashboards.
I asked ChatGPT:
What common biases affect IT managers making purchasing decisions in B2B telco?
Output:
It helped me simulate scenarios:
Overwhelmed by features → choice paralysis
Prefer known brands → authority bias
Want instant value → anchoring effect
I applied these findings to reframe flows in Uizard and validated key screens in Useberry. Every AI-generated insight had a psychological bias at its core.
So, Can AI Truly Understand Human Behaviour?
Not exactly. AI doesn't "feel" or "empathise" but it models us shockingly well based on patterns. With the right prompts and tools, we can:
Predict behaviour patterns early
Surface cognitive friction before launch
Make smarter, bias-aware design decisions
But here’s the kicker: the AI is only as good as your intent. Use it to support human-centered design, not replace it.
Now, its your turn…
What AI tools are you using to explore behavioural psychology in UX?
Are you leaning into nudges, feedback loops, or subtle bias triggers?
Drop your tools, prompts, or experiments in the comments - I’m collecting insights for the next piece in this series (and would love to include yours!).
Subscribe to Design x Machine for deep dives into the intersection of UX, psychology, and intelligent systems.
👉 Get the free UX prompt guide when you subscribe: https://designxmachine.beehiiv.com/subscribe